83% felt it. 30% could prove it.


Yesterday I saw the survey results from a room full of executives with some surprising results.

A conference organizer had polled about a hundred attendees ahead of an AI focused event. Eighty three percent said AI had improved their work. Thirty percent said the investment had actually paid for itself.

I think we're all experiencing this right now. I call it "modern day magic". AI delivers on so much so quickly. Not always the best, but faster and sometimes better than on our own. So the question is: why do so few people feel that the investment pays for itself?

The reason is that comfort is easy to self report and it flatters everyone. Ask someone if AI has helped them and they will say yes, because it probably has, in some diffuse way that felt good in the moment. ROI asks a harder question. What number did you expect to move, and what did it look like before you started. Almost nobody takes that baseline, because by the time you're excited enough to start, you've already skipped the step where you would have written it down.

The fix is one sentence, written earlier than feels natural.

Pick one workflow where AI is already involved, and before you touch it again, write down the single number it's supposed to move. Hours saved on a specific report. Dollars spent on a specific subscription. Days to close something that used to take weeks. Not a vibe. A number.

Then ask your team a sharper question than "has this helped." Ask what they'd actually notice if you turned it off for a week. If the honest answer is nothing, you've found a line item to cut. If the honest answer is panic, you've found your baseline, three months late but not too late to use.

Feeling helped and being able to prove it are two different projects. Only one of them survives budget season.

Alex

Alex Talks AI

As an AI Coach, Advisor, and Agent Builder, I help organizations and business leaders harness the power of artificial intelligence to boost productivity and streamline operations. I enable organizations to navigate the transformative landscape of AI, educating teams, identifying operational and strategic opportunities with AI and creating a framework for safe and transparent use of data in the organization.

Read more from Alex Talks AI

Last week a client texted me a screenshot of her Claude usage meter, hit her limit by 2pm, and said “I asked like ten questions today. How is this possible?” I went looking for the answer, and it led me to a piece by a builder named Nate who tracks his own AI token usage obsessively. He opened his tracker after a long day and found 3.77 billion tokens. Most of it was “reused” input: material he never typed. Why? Because every time you message the model, the LLM is reloading all the previous...

Yesterday a Chief Commercial Officer at a tech company told me about the week he almost lost control of his own roadmap. One of his team members was buried in pricing math and contract paperwork, so she built herself a Claude tool to handle it. Nobody asked her to. She just noticed the friction and fixed it for herself. Within days, a few colleagues spotted the tool and got excited. They wanted to bend it toward bulk pricing quotes, a job that depends on forecasting and optimization data the...

Yesterday I told you about the panic that hit me the night before my son's SAT. I'd given an unidentified company access to my Google account. I had no idea what it could see or do with it. I mentioned this briefly yesterday, but I'd built this before. The agent I built took hours of trial and error to wire up and lived inside Telegram, a messaging app. I gave it access to my Gmail and my Calendar. It could read, draft, edit, and delete emails. It could create and cancel calendar invites. All...