|
You've heard the complaints about AI slop. The generic LinkedIn posts. The Twitter threads that all sound the same. The flood of content that exists because it's now almost free to make. Everyone's pointing at the public version of this problem, the stuff strangers scroll past on their feeds. Nobody's talking about the slop we make for ourselves. Here's what I mean. The same thing that makes public AI slop so easy to produce (low effort, instant output, a little hit of delight every time) is happening quietly inside our own work. We're generating it constantly. And most of it nobody else will ever see. My favorite example lives in the artifacts panel in Claude. If you haven't played with it, artifacts are the little HTML files and mini-websites you can spin up in seconds. A dashboard. A tracker. A tiny app. They are genuinely fun to build. I get a real kick out of watching one appear. And that's exactly the trap, because I'll make five of them in an afternoon and use approximately zero. It feels productive. You're typing, things are appearing, the screen is busy. But step back and ask the boring question: what did any of it actually do? Did it move a number? Save you an hour next week? Help a client? Or did it just feel like work while you sat at the bottom of the curve. That's the J-curve of productivity, and the bottom of it is crowded right now. We're pouring real time into AI and generating real output, and a lot of that output goes nowhere. The activity is up. The outcomes are flat. Making slop for an audience of one is still making slop. I'm not saying stop experimenting. The play is where the learning happens. But there's a difference between an experiment that teaches you something and a habit that just keeps you busy. The artifact you abandon taught you a prompt. The tenth one you abandon taught you nothing except that you like the feeling of making them. Here's the good news, and it's the part I'm genuinely excited about. The distance between "fun thing I'll never open again" and "tool I use every single day" is much shorter than it looks. You don't need to be technical. You don't need a new platform. You mostly need one shift in how you start. I'm going to show you exactly what that shift is. On Monday I'm kicking off a week-long challenge built around turning your AI slop into things you'll actually reach for on a daily basis. Real tools, real use, no more abandoned tabs. More on how it works tomorrow. Alex P.S. Be honest with yourself before Monday. How many AI creations have you made this month that you've actually used more than once? That number is the whole point. |
As an AI Coach, Advisor, and Agent Builder, I help organizations and business leaders harness the power of artificial intelligence to boost productivity and streamline operations. I enable organizations to navigate the transformative landscape of AI, educating teams, identifying operational and strategic opportunities with AI and creating a framework for safe and transparent use of data in the organization.
Next week we're going to graduate from AI slop creator to real builder. I am going to show you how easy it is. We're going to build a To Do list tracker that really works *for you.* Why? Two reasons: One - Because I've downloaded, abandoned, and felt quietly guilty about more task apps than I can count. Todoist, Things, Notion, a legal pad, the Notes app, a whiteboard I can't see from my desk. None of them were wrong. They just weren't mine; each one was someone else's idea of how I should...
Most of us ask AI to do the one thing it's worst at. We ask it to decide. "Which vendor should I pick?" "Is this a good hire?" "Should we raise prices?" And it answers instantly, confidently, in a clean paragraph. The problem is that the confident paragraph is often the shallow one. Here's how to fix that, and it takes about thirty extra seconds. First, the proof it matters. Researchers gave a top AI model a farmer's question: plant apples or grapefruit next year? The model saw that...
Yesterday a portfolio manager I work with sent me a link. "Free trial," she wrote. "Tell me what you think. Is this actually useful, or am I paying for ChatGPT in a trench coat?" She'd signed up for a new investment research platform. Pick a public company and you get a bull case, bear case, list of risks, questions for management, a multi-year financial story, earnings review, and relevant podcasts. All sourced from the standard stuff: EDGAR, earnings transcripts, proxies, podcasts. Her...