|
Aaron Levie, the CEO of Box, posted this week that he’s seeing “productivity gains that are an order of magnitude or two above output levels pre-AI.” An order of magnitude or two. That’s 10x to 100x. He was reacting to a post from developer Theo Browne about the gap between average and great engineers, and his point is a good one. People who had deep expertise before AI, and who are willing to work differently now, are pulling further ahead. He thinks finance, science and cyber are next. Then someone in the comments did the math, and I love them for it. To be 100x more productive, you’d need to finish in one hour what used to take 100 hours. Over an 8-hour day, that’s 800 hours of work. A quarter is roughly 13 weeks of 40 hours, or 520 hours. So 100x means finishing about 1.5 quarters of work every single day. Picture your Q1 plan, half of Q2, and a board deck, all done by 6pm Tuesday. Then again Wednesday. That’s not where most of us are. And I don’t think it’s where we need to be to change how our work feels. Here’s what 2x looks like in practice. 2x means a day’s work done by lunch. The memo that takes a full afternoon takes an hour and a half. The research you’d normally push to next week happens this week, because it finally fits. That kind of gain comes from three ordinary things:
That’s exactly what we do in my AI Leveraged Program. Clients bring a real piece of their work and we build the AI version together, live. After one of those sessions, a client wrote to me: “Thank you. This was amazing. I’m obsessed with this.” That’s what 2x feels like from the inside. You get back hours on a task you used to dread, and you start looking around for the next one. Levie is right that the ceiling keeps rising, and the people with deep domain knowledge will get the most leverage. The path to 10x runs through a stack of 2x wins, one workflow at a time. So here’s a question as you start this week: which task, if it took half the time, would change your week? Start there. Alex |
As an AI Coach, Advisor, and Agent Builder, I help organizations and business leaders harness the power of artificial intelligence to boost productivity and streamline operations. I enable organizations to navigate the transformative landscape of AI, educating teams, identifying operational and strategic opportunities with AI and creating a framework for safe and transparent use of data in the organization.
Last week I asked a nonprofit executive director about her biggest pain point at work. Her answer: her to-do list. It lives in eight or more places. Email, calendar, meeting notes, and a separate email thread for each of her direct reports, where team notes pile up between one-on-ones. There's no single place she can look and see everything she owes everyone. If you run a team, you probably recognize that list. (I certainly do.) We looked at two options together. The first is an automated...
Here's a study worth reading before you sign your next memo. On Oct 27, Anthropic published a study called "How AI agents shape experts' judgment calls." Here's what they did. They asked 50 professional analysts, all experienced in working out cause and effect from data, to advise a farming cooperative. The question: is the co-op's advisory program working well enough to expand? Each analyst worked with Claude Code. Along the way, the analysts had four judgment calls to make, each with two...
I connected ChatGPT to my Amex accounts this week and asked it one question: where am I leaking money? It handed me a "potential savings tracker." Four line items, each with a recommended action: Bolt, $240 a year. Cancel if unused. Experian, $324.96 a year. Downgrade if the paid benefits are unnecessary. Hearst Connecticut Media, $431.52 a year. Cancel if unused. An extra Amazon charge, $143.28 a year. Cancel only if it's a duplicate monthly membership. Total: $1,139.76 a year. I've already...