|
A friend recently told me about spending a couple of months renting in a place they’d always fantasized about owning. The surprise wasn’t the view or the weather, but the learning. Only after living there did they realize what actually mattered: which floor avoids the parking structure roof, why a third bedroom changes everything, and what “ideal” really means in practice. That’s exactly what I see in AI adoption. Most leaders want the “purchase decision” immediately: platform standardization, a big rollout, a clean ROI story. But the real insight happens in the rental phase: the messy weeks when you learn how work actually happens. In the conversation, we got unusually specific about a step I think belongs in every AI program: asking people to “go meta” on their own workflows. By "meta" I mean taking a step back and getting a bird's eye view of their work. Not brainstormy. Not aspirational. Concrete:
If you’ve ever cooked without a recipe, you understand the problem. You can make the dish by instinct, but if you had to teach someone else, you’d suddenly need to specify: how many eggs, what heat, what “done” looks like. AI is the same. If you can’t describe the recipe, you can’t delegate it to an agent, a workflow, or even a well-designed prompt. Two important implications for CEOs (yes, even the ones who “have a team for that”): 1) This work feels slower at the start. Productivity often dips before it rises. It's the classic J-curve. That’s not failure; it’s the cost of making tacit work explicit. The practical move: build “recipe time” into your AI rollout (office hours, small-group clinics, or structured check-ins) so the hard part (clarity) actually happens. Because the organizations that outperform with AI aren’t the ones with the most tools. They’re the ones who can explain how work gets done. Alex |
As an AI Coach, Advisor, and Agent Builder, I help organizations and business leaders harness the power of artificial intelligence to boost productivity and streamline operations. I enable organizations to navigate the transformative landscape of AI, educating teams, identifying operational and strategic opportunities with AI and creating a framework for safe and transparent use of data in the organization.
I saw the future yesterday. In a blurry screenshot I pulled from my laptop while sitting across the room with my phone. Here's what happened. Claude Desktop (the app that launched in January with Code and Cowork) quietly added something new: Dispatch. It's a feature that lets your phone talk to your desktop. Not just send messages. Actually operate your computer. I paired my phone with my desktop through a QR code in the app's left-hand menu, tapped Dispatch, and typed: "Get the last...
I’ve been on a lot of calls lately with private equity firms trying to figure out AI. Not “should we use AI” calls. That ship has sailed. These are the harder conversations: where do we actually start, what’s worth paying for, and how do we get our teams to use this stuff consistently? Three calls in this week. Three very different firms. And yet the same five themes kept surfacing. I think they apply well beyond PE, to enterprise and to non-profits. Build vs. Buy is the wrong question (until...
There's a specific kind of anxiety that comes with being in AI right now. It's not the fear of being left behind. It's the accumulation of "I should really learn that"... the Substack you flagged, the YouTube video someone texted you, the X thread with 200 likes you saved and never opened. For a while, my "learning system" was a graveyard of browser tabs and starred emails. I knew things were there. I just couldn't find them. And the more they piled up, the less I actually learned because...