|
I'm writing this from a salon chair on Saturday night; to be sent on Monday morning. I had an event Saturday evening and needed to do something about my hair. I didn't book the appointment. My AI agent did. I use two of them, Muse and Grokbot, depending on what I'm trying to get done. This morning I needed a same-day blowout. The agent checked availability across four salons, matched the open slots against my calendar, and I ended up here with Karina. Sitting here, I scrolled back through everything I've asked these agents to do over the past few weeks. The list surprised me. Travel and logistics
Appointments
Kids
Money and inbox
Work
Most of this is the connective tissue of a life. The checking, cross-referencing, and remembering that usually lives in my head at 11 PM. The most valuable moments were the catches. The $34 fee. The two Claude accounts. The salon that only takes phone calls. Noticing what's off is where the time actually comes back. For the leaders I work with, this is the useful mental shift. Chatbots answer questions. Agents carry errands across apps (email, calendar, booking systems, the web) and come back with a result. If you've only used AI to draft emails, try handing it one errand this week that touches two or three systems. A booking. A reschedule. A subscription audit. Then watch what it catches. Alex |
As an AI Coach, Advisor, and Agent Builder, I help organizations and business leaders harness the power of artificial intelligence to boost productivity and streamline operations. I enable organizations to navigate the transformative landscape of AI, educating teams, identifying operational and strategic opportunities with AI and creating a framework for safe and transparent use of data in the organization.
Nate B. Jones wrote something last week that I've been chewing on. He described research (from Epoch and METR) where the same Claude model rebuilt a roughly 16,000-line scientific toolkit from its behavior alone, without seeing the code. Then, asked to customize a smaller library, it produced something unusable. Same model. Wildly different results. His explanation: AI improves fastest where results are cheap to check, like proofs and tests. It improves slowest where feedback is slow, like...
I recently spent a session with an investor walking through everything Claude can do. At the end, he asked: "Okay, now how do I get all the really good investment ideas from Claude?" A fair question. Also the wrong one. Around the same time, I was working with a hedge fund team on the same material. Same tools, same techniques. They went somewhere completely different with it. They connected the dots on their own. They took what I taught them and ran their own view of what makes a good...
Last week I sat down with the COO and general counsel of a hedge fund that's about to start AI training. We were talking governance, and I opened with a picture. Right now, every analyst who uses Claude describes the firm in their own words. How you invest, what you care about, what a good idea looks like. Twenty-two people, twenty-two descriptions. But your fundraising decks present a different picture: One firm, one description of the company and its investment strategy. Signed off by the...